Giggling at Unintended Consequences

WEST VALLEY CITY, UT - MARCH 2: West Valley City patrol officer Gatrell starts a body camera recording by pressing a button on his chest before he takes a theft report from a construction worker with his newly-issued body camera attached to the side of a pair of glasses on March 2, 2015 in West Valley City, Utah. West Valley City Police Department has issued 190 Taser Axon Flex body cameras for all it's sworn officers to wear starting today. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)

By Steve Pomper | September 11, 2019

Unintended consequences can be a bitch. But it can also be a bit of schadenfreude when you’d warned the people suffering such consequences. I’m talking about police officer-worn body cameras. Unlike an officer’s other items on his or her “Bat Belt” containing radio, pepper spray, baton, or gun, cops have no say in how or when to deploy the camera—policy dictates the hows and whens. But what happens when the how and the when are all the time.

The Virginia-Pilot’s headline explains the issue well: “Police body cameras are capturing so much footage it’s driving some defense attorneys to quit.” Newport News public defender Robert Moody says, “It is completely overwhelming.”

According to the story, police agencies in Virginia deploy more than 7,300 body cameras throughout the commonwealth. Public defenders, 93 percent of them, say they simply don’t have time to review all the footage. Another 73 percent say they are “unable to do other case-related work.” So, they’re quitting. They act as if the issue had blindsided them when they were one faction calling for vehicle and officer-worn cameras. They focused on the political and neglected the technical. Let’s get the cops.

They’re lawyers, right? Went to law school and all that stuff. And what are police videos? Evidence. And what are prosecutors required to do with exculpatory evidence (beneficial to the defendant)? Turn it over to the defense. And what is the defense obligated to do? Watch every moment of that raw footage to find out if they can use anything to help their clients.

Okay, I’m no lawyer (though I played with them at work), but most cops saw this one coming. There are two reasons I giggle when I hear things like this. One, most videos exonerate officers. Two, I get to think: we told you so. Childish? Perhaps, but I’ll risk the consequences.

This piece originally appeared in OpsLens and is used by permission.

Taliban Talks Will Continue Soon, If Only in Secret

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carl Higbie. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.

Join the Discussion

COMMENT POLICY: We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, hard-core profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment!