News

Glock Wins Gun Lawsuit – Not Liable for the Crimes of Criminals

The Democrats want to be able sue the gun-makers for gun crimes that have nothing to do with issues with the product itself.

Wooden judge gavel and gun over USA flag - studio shoot

The Democrats want to be able sue the gun-makers for gun crimes that have nothing to do with issues with the product itself. They don’t want to sue because the guns were made wrong or malfunctioned and caused someone injury or death.

The Democrats want to blame the guns for the actual gun crimes instead of the people pulling the triggers. 

Like somehow the guns go off and shoot people all by themselves. 

That’s nice for the criminals – not having to bear any responsibility. 

The prisons will be empty. The leftists would love that.

Recently though, the gun haters had a big setback when a federal judge in Arizona ruled in favor of Glock, a pistol manufacturer.

The Washington Examiner reported that the (Trump-appointed) judge dismissed a lawsuit by The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence on behalf of a man who was accidentally shot and paralyzed.

According to the Examiner, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Brnovich “upheld liability immunity granted in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act passed in 2005 to block gun-makers from a potential wave of industry-killing lawsuits.”

The decision was made in mid-March but it’s been pretty much ignored by the fake news media. 

We are only now hearing about it as the Biden Harris Obama administration moves forward to try to change the immunity for gun-makers – either through the zillionth Biden Executive Order or by sticking it into a reconciliation bill.

This piece was written by Liberty Paige on May 12, 2021. It originally appeared in SteveGruber.com and is used by permission.

Read more at SteveGruber.com:
So We Need Pipelines After All?
Census Data Doesn’t Match Number of Voters in 2020 Election – Off by 4 Million
Israeli Police Attacked by Rioting Palestinians – Biden Sends Thoughts and Prayers

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carl Higbie. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.

Join the Discussion

COMMENT POLICY: We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, hard-core profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment!